forecast · section 07 of 10

The 24-month horizon — six dated bets

Where do costs head, and which dated bets would falsify that?

Six dated binary bets with explicit probabilities and annulment conditions — efficiency-driven decline, custom-silicon share, demand elasticity, subsidy contraction, open-weight parity, and edge expansion.

These are probability-bearing judgments over a short record, not calibrated forecasts; two of the six rest on structured priors with named missing baselines.

The section itself

The forecast notebook has now asserted its dated binary bets (evidence cut 2026-08-20, resolution by August 2028):

Bet Claim P Confidence
FC1 Model efficiency (not hardware) drives >50% of further price decline 0.70 medium
FC2 Hyperscaler custom silicon reaches 25%+ of inference workload by mid-2028 0.45 low-medium
FC3 Jevons paradox holds — a 50% unit-cost cut raises volume more than 50% 0.65 medium
FC4 Subsidies contract 50%+, raising effective cost 1.5–3x for subsidized users 0.50 low-medium
FC5 Open-weight models reach quality parity on most workloads within 24 months 0.55 medium-low
FC6 Edge becomes cost-advantageous for a materially larger workload set 0.60 medium-low

The structural read: the 10x/year compression era is ending (fixed-quality decline is decelerating toward 1.5–5x/year and bifurcating — commodity approaching free, frontier reasoning moving up in price), so planning should treat unit cost as a shrinking but non-zero line item while total spend likely still rises (FC3). The least evidenced bets — subsidy contraction and demand elasticity — are the ones that would move budgets most.

Who uses this section, and for what

Reader questions that route through here

In sequence